![]() One problem I see with CircuitLab schematics is that all too often people get lazy and grab a symbol for a similar part without updating its annotation to the actual part they are using. Whether having a second schematic editor would increase the average quality of schematics posted here, I can't guess. Anything that helps people draw neat and readable schematics here is a benefit. CircuitLab schematics are always more readable than anything else posted by the great unwashed masses. However, I've seen others use CircuitLab with good success. That's because I'm quite comfortable with Eagle and have created some scripts and procedures for getting schematics from Eagle into posts and have the result look nice. I personally don't use CircuitLab and wouldn't use anything else you add either. I'd probably use it more than Circuit Lab if the part number issue (and lack of text annotation) were fixed. Overall, I like it and I think it would be a good addition to the site. I suppose I can just take a screenshot, so I'll call this a nice-to-have feature. I don't see a way to save a waveform as an image. (I have a 3.5 GHz Core i7 3770k with 16 gigs of RAM, so I'm pretty sure it's not me.) This is using Firefox with three tabs open. This could confuse college students trying to simulate their homework.Ĭlicking and dragging to move the schematic around is extremely laggy. The "ideal" op amp defaults to a gain-bandwidth product of 1 MHz and an output resistance of 100 ohms. There should be something to indicate that a waveform is old. #SIERRA CHARTS WAVEBOX UPDATE#The waveform viewer doesn't update automatically when I rerun the simulation. (Per Olin's post, the default part number should be blank.) Fixing this could be as simple as adding a second text label. I don't see any way to have both a reference designator and a part number. Circuit Lab doesn't have PID blocks or three-phase transforms.īeing able to put a waveform directly on the schematic is nice. The abstract blocks could be very helpful for system-level questions. The error message are much more helpful than they are in Circuit Lab. I find it somewhat less clunky than CircuitLab. ![]() I seem to be a bit late to the party, but I did play with SystemVision for a bit and I have some feedback.ĭrawing a schematic is actually pretty smooth. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |